MEV


GreenPower competition

Contents, this page


Introduction

4QD have, for many years, supplied motor speed controllers to the Greenpower battery-powered electric car competition and our controllers are generally highly efficient. We don't have efficiency figures for other controllers, but our design team do not like wasting power, so they are likely to be as high in efficiency as any controllers you can get. The event has been won more than once using our controllers.

We have written this page to assist would be-entrants in choosing a controller for the event.


Interpreting the rules

There is a lot of information including the rules, tips etc at the official Greenpower www site.

The information here is based on the rules for the Formula 24 event as published in May 2005.

Motor and batteries are fixed. So the electrical energy choices are simply:

  1. How to maximise the available energy
  2. How to make best use of the available energy

Maximising the available energy

The rules say Forms of additional free natural power can be used. This clearly encourages the use of solar panels to keep the batteries topped up. But let's examine possible sources of free energy. These could include

Solar power
Clearly, solar power is allowed under the rules. As you are allowed two sets of batteries, one on charge, one in use extra power is not a prime consideration. But solar power will extend time between charges and will therefore reduce down time as well as keeping the battery voltage higher for longer. The higher the batery voltage, the faster the motor will run.
Wind power
This is a little more tricky as the rules say additional free natural power can be used but must only provide motive force through this motor.
So a wind generator is allowable. Sails are not. However aerodynamic performance of the vehicle is part of its overall efficient design and is of prime importance. So if the vehicle is shaped to have high resistance to a tail wind, such a tail wind will act as motive power. Tail wind is a free source of power which will have an effect on any vehicle. How far utilising this deliberately will be interpreted as breaking the rules, I leave to you!
Braking energy
The event takes place on a race track. How much you need to brake will depend on the track and on your speed. However any mechanical braking wastes power. Regenerative braking done via the controller recovers energy by feeding the braking energy back to the batteries. How efficient that is depends on the motor and the drive system, but if you do a lot of braking it can be significant.

Even if you have a freewheel (so cannot use regenerative braking) it does no harm and a controller with regenerative braking is usually slightly more efficient than one without (for reasons, you will have to get quite technical). So you should chose a controller with regenerative braking.


Making best use of the available energy

This means building an efficient design. Efficiency must be maximised in the following areas of the design:

Mechanical efficiency
If truth be told, the competition is all about the mechanical design of an efficient vehicle. This, above everything else, will define the competition's winner. I am not a mechanical designer but the areas you must look at are:
Aerodynamic efficiency
Clearly a vital area. Wind resistance increases fast as speed increases. Remember also that natural wind may occur: can you make use of this to assist progress?
Rolling efficiency.
If the vehicle does not roll very freely, on the straight and when cornering, it is wasting power.
Mechanical drive train efficiency
The motor's mechanical output has to be transferred to motive power. Gear trains, especially worm gears, are not 100% efficient and there is no point in wasting more of your limited power in the gears than you cam help.

Remember also that if you are (as you should) using regenerative braking, you should also consider the efficiency of the gears when used in reverse, during braking, to feed energy back to the controller.

Motor efficiency
The motor's performance curves (which are available as a design tip from the official www site, see More information, below) include a graph of its efficiency, which are typical for a motor of this type.

Such motor performance curves show only the performance at one voltage, i.e. without a speed controller. However for this sort of contest you need to have as much power output as possible at maximum efficiency: that requires running the motor at the highest allowable voltage, i.e. 24v. That is with the speed controller at maximum! Efficiency curves for other voltages are not quoted, but one can expect the same sort of shape of curve - at low motor currents efficiency drops off because of brush pressure and other mechanical friction. At high currents motor heating causes high losses. Looking at the graph - motor efficiency is maximum at a load of 1.5 amps.

The motor's efficiency is a maximum 72% at around 1800 rpm, falling fast at slower speeds, either unloaded or under heavy loads. So you need to keep the motor speed around 1500-1800 rpm as far as is possible. This requires a variable speed mechanical drive, or at least a very good range of gear ratios. An electrical speed controller's purpose is to vary the speed by altering te applied voltage, so will may not be able to maintain the motor near its maximum efficiency and power output.

Do I need a speed controller?
Yes.

Even with very good mechanical gearing, if you connect a motor through a simple switch to a battery a huge current flows. Thus huge current causes heating proportional to the square of the current. Power dissipated is I2R, where R is the resistance of motor, wiring and batteries. Accelerating the motor voltage in a controlled fashion via a speed controller will reduce this surge current.

The speed controller can also give you regenerative braking which increases efficiency.

Controller efficiency
Speed controllers are high efficiency devices having efficiency figures in the high 90s, if you wish a percentage. To be honest, it's the mechanical design of the machine that's important, not the controller. Unless your mechanical design is extremely good, whether the controller is 95 or 98% efficient is not important!

Suitable controllers

The motor current should not rise much above around 50 amps: at 50 amps the motor efficiency is already down to 55%. So suitable controllers include:


More information





Page Information


Document URI: www.4qd.co.uk/evs/greenpower.html
Page first published 12th of May, 2005
Last modified: Wednesday, 09-Jan-2008 14:53:32 GMT
© 2005-2007 4QD
Page's Author: Richard Torrens